El Mensajero (English)

Posted: November 12, 2019

Last Updated: November 13, 2019

EMC file photo

Gayle Harrison participates in a 24-hour vigil outside Rochester City Hall May to show her support for an all-civilian police accountability board in Rochester. The proposition to create such a board was approved by city voters during the Nov. 5 general election.

Rochester’s Police Accountability Board referendum passes

By Ketsia Rodríguez/EMC

The City of Rochester’s Police Accountability Board referendum was approved during the Nov. 5 general election.
 
Unofficial results were posted to the Monroe County Board of Elections website late in the evening on Nov. 5. As of press time Nov. 8, the tally showed that almost 20,000 city residents voted for the proposition, compared to about 6,500 who voted against it.
 
The referendum, listed as Proposition No. 1 on the back of the Nov. 5 ballot, proposed to amend the city charter to authorize the creation of the Police Accountability Board.
 
According to the approved proposition, the PAB will consist of nine unpaid Rochester residents: one appointed by Mayor Lovely Warren and eight appointed by the Rochester City Council, with four of the council’s appointees nominated by a coalition of community organizations. The PAB will have the power to independently investigate civilian complaints, subpoena information for its investigations and determine whether individual Rochester Police Department officers have committed misconduct. The PAB also will create disciplinary guidelines, with an opportunity for input from the chief of police and the police union. If the PAB finds, after a hearing, that an officer has committed misconduct, the chief of police will be required to impose discipline consistent with disciplinary guidelines. The PAB also will recommend changes to the police department’s policies, practices and training.
 
The establishment of the PAB will occur over the next 90 days.
 
During an Oct. 31 press conference, Mike Mazzeo, president of the Rochester Police Locust Club, said that the club’s legal fight against the legislation will continue.
 

Comments

Post a Comment
  1. We encourage participation in discussion of the articles on this site. We review — but do not edit — all comments before they are posted. We will not accept comments that are off-topic or clearly promoting a commercial, political or self-serving agenda. Comments must be civil and respectful. Inappropriate language will not be accepted. Comments containing links that lead away from this site will not be posted. To make a comment, please review and indicate your acceptance of our full Terms and Conditions

  2. Leave this field empty

Required Field